He Resisted Arrest and Other Main Stream Media Lies

jfk

The other big issue MSMM (Main Stream Moron Media (ABCNBCCBSCNN)) is trying to sell the American Public is “Don’t Resist” terminology through their neuro linguistic programming techniques.

This is very apparent in the Eric Garner case in New York. Read about the bombshell interview that took place with Benjamin Carr. Benjamin Carr is Eric Garner’s stepfather, who was in the media recently peacefully resolving a situation with an angry protester. If you dig a little deeper we see that Pantaleo, the man who was responsible for Garner’s death, has been sued three times for violating the constitutional rights of other black males in the area, by performing humiliating strip searches and fondling the genitalia of his victims, some of them in public view.

“Don’t Resist” Yeah….

It worked really good for these folks…

They did what they were told, did not resist, and look what that got them…

truly-free-humanity

Jews Genocided: 6 million

Native Americans Genocided: 12 million

Christians Genocided: 70 Million

Are you going to walk peacefully into the camps, or are you going to defend you freedoms?

Now, we are not advocating violence, however we must take a look at what the law says about an “Arrest”;

The important thing to remember, which the MSMM are not talking about is there are two types of arrest

1. Lawful Arrest
2. Unlawful Arrest

Do you understand the difference between the two?

Do you hear anywhere, in the MSMM, where they distinguish between the two? No…

Lawful Arrest

A lawful arrest occurs when a ‘police officer’ acts within the law. Sounds simple enough, doesn’t it?

They can you physical methods to bring an individual under their control. In other words, it has to be justified. Most jurisdictions have affirmative defenses justifying the use of force. T

Resisting Arrest?

Resisting arrest occurs when a person interferes with a law enforcement officer’s attempt to perform a lawful arrest. Some states call the crime “obstruction.” The crime can be a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the severity of the actions of the person being arrested.

The important part is was the arrest lawful or not. If the police do not follow procedure, or break another law when attempting to restrain you, it could be unlawful. You have no right to resist if it is lawful, however history is full of examples where enforcers claim they were ‘just following orders’ and they were found guilty of genocide and many of their victims marched willing to their deaths. Further, if the police officer uses excessive force in the execution of a lawful arrest, then there may be conditions upon which defending yourself is justified by self-defense. In most states, in order for self-defense to be available the person being arrested must:

  • be the one attacked by a police officer,
  • have reasonable ground to believe, and in good faith does believe, that your life is in danger, and that you, or someone you know will suffer great bodily injury, and
  • must only meet the attack with such reasonable force as necessary to save his own life and protect himself from great bodily injury

Unlawful Arrest

Lets see what the law has to say about it…

“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer’s life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”

“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.

“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).

“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).

Again, we are not advocating violence, the only purpose of this article is to point out how the MSMM is not mentioning a word about the two types of ‘arrest’ and how that can effect a persons actions…

MSMM want’s you to follow the ‘orders’ of the enforcers, no mater if they are legal or illegal.

aleksandr-solzhenitsyn“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

Download PDF